I'm farting and lighting my purse on fire at the same time!!!

Sticky Posts
The Ghettotenna
SVG Icons
Brew Your Own Damn Beer
Latest Comments
linkapalooza (5 comments)
Objects in the Mirror (4 comments)
Doo Dah Doo Doo Doo Dah Dah Doo... Big News Coming Your Way!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (3 comments)
SVG Icons (7 comments)
A Revolution in Taco Consumption (5 comments)
Links & Friends
PVP Online
Boing Boing
The Sneeze
Penny Arcade
glitch13.com :.::.: ..:.::. :.:::... Home | About | Feedback | Archive | RSS

Category: Philosophy
Friday, December 10th, 2004 @ 03:37 pm
Posted By Brent
A week or so ago John had posted his stance on drugs on his site which caused a small conversation on a live journal somewhere buried in the internet. This conversation included a few people explaining their stances, and verbalizing pros and cons. Because I missed out on joining this conversation, and I felt that with my modicum of experience in the area I should just go ahead and pick my own brain on the topic for all to read on my website. Please keep in mind that all statements made here are from my experience. You may virulently disagree with some or all of them, but I am only able to opine on what I've been exposed to or experienced.

First things first, a small note about addiction. I stick to my guns on the assumption that the majority of all drugs are on average equally mentally addictive. I've seen potheads need pot, and I've seen part time heroin users. There are a billion outside variables that can influence how addictive substances appear such as social acceptance, ease of use, and cost, but in the end you're really just addicted to either a)fun, b)introspection/spirituality, or c)memories tied to the drug's use or influence (and sometimes d)your ability to seduce the opposite sex with substances). There's my two cents on addiction. Physical addiction is something I have little to no experience with outside of nicotine.

The way I see it, there are basically two "greater" categories of drugs, with members of each broken further down within these categories. These are A) active drugs, drugs that consume the majority of your attention while you are under their influence, and there are B) passive drugs, meaning drugs that you can passively enjoy (or lament) their effects.

A passive drug would be marijuana or cocaine. Something you do, then go out (or do while you're out) and it either heightens the fun you have while out, or adds another "layer" to the festivities. These tend to be more popular due to their ability to be consumed alongside virtually any other activity and the moderate to non-existent crash associated with them, especially in the case of marijuana. I also often compare these drugs to their more socially acceptable (and legal) cousins such as alcohol and tabacco in effect and morality.

An active drug would be something like LSD (acid) or ecstasy (x, MDMA) that you would usually just want a comfortable place to hang out in and feel the effects. This of course isn't to say that you can't, or people don't go out or socialize while under the influence of these drugs, it's just that the consensus is that a more "controlled" atmosphere is more conducive to enjoying these experiences. They also usually tend to make you feel disconnected (but functional) for days after their use. People usually really dig these when they're younger, but tend to "grown out" of them because they don't have two to three days to set aside for drug use and recovery.

Further breaking things down, I divide things on what I call advertising. This is how I label and factor down a drugs perception in terms of popular opinion and stereotyping. All drugs have bad advertising, but not all drugs also have good advertising. I realize that "good" and "bad" are subjective terms in this context, so I'll leave it as an exercise for the reader to digest this as a singular point of view.

For example, crack has a shit-ton of bad advertising, from crack heads, to crack whores, to crack babies, to crack pipe burns, to ashy lips. But never is there any glamorous portrayal of consuming crack, or luxuriously reclining in a chaise lounge while enjoying the "high off crack" experience. Nope, just mental images of people in ripped up pants with twigs sticking out of their nappy hair, twitching and scratching their torsos. With an advertising campaign like that one has to wonder why anyone ever tries crack to begin with.

There is no opposite end of the spectrum, due to what I said before about all drugs having bad advertising, so I'll just have to grab one out of the pile. Marijuana has bad advertising in so far as people's perceptions that "pot heads" just sit around all day with no ambition trying to MacGuyver-up bongs out of esoteric household items. But you also have an image of Snoop Dog, puffing on a Philly blunt, sitting in a hot tub situated on the veranda of a beautiful estate, surrounded by bikini clad women that you would gladly trade your soul for one hour of bliss with. Now that's some damn good advertising. Now you probably won't ever achieve that latter by smoking pot, but you're not going to end up the former without being a lazy shit to begin with either.

I hope you're beginning to understand the scales with which I weigh the pros and cons of the cornucopia of deleterious substances that pervade our day to day lives. It's not a perfect system by any means, but a perfect system outside of complete avoidance does not exist. By the way, this is not professional advice an any way. Please do not mistake me for an expert in anything outside of laying the manpipe on beautiful women.


NAME: shit
Sunday, December 12th, 2004 @ 02:03 pm
you pussy!

NAME: g13
Saturday, December 11th, 2004 @ 06:27 pm
GHB: Definately a passive drug, except for that part where you puke and become comatose for hours at a time.

NAME: asshole
Saturday, December 11th, 2004 @ 05:48 pm
ghb. the greatest drug hands down. i need some!

NAME: ian
Friday, December 10th, 2004 @ 05:13 pm
appropriately enough, the random quote when i loaded the site:

I don't use drugs; my dreams are frightening enough.

-M.C. Escher